Cascades’ Life Cycle Assessment Demonstrates that its Polystyrene Foam Packaging Are an Excellent Environmental Choice

The environmental performance of our trays is much better than popular belief. Polystyrene foam can now be part of our environmental packaging solution.

Nov 25 2011 --- Cascades is proud to release the results of a life cycle analysis (LCA) conducted by CIRAIG that calculates the ecological footprint for various food packaging trays made from six types of plastic and molded pulp originating from its own plants. Putting an end to the myth, the results actually demonstrate that Cascades polystyrene foam is a good choice for the environment!

The LCA results support the finding that for food packaging trays manufactured by Cascades, the amount of material and type of energy used are the factors that have the most impact on the environment, while the end of life has little impact. Polystyrene foam, made of over 90 percent air, has an irrefutable ecological advantage, despite the fact that it is rarely recycled. For the items studied, this material produced the least amount of greenhouse gas emissions throughout the entire product life cycle, from raw material extraction to end-of-life. In addition, using recycled materials in the fabrication of food packaging trays, as is the case with the RPET (recycled polyethylene terephthalate) and molded pulp, results in tangible environmental benefits, as doing so reduces the impact resulting from raw material extraction.

Luc Langevin, President and COO of Cascades Specialty Products Group, says, “This analysis provides a new perspective on food packaging. The environmental performance of our trays is much better than popular belief. Polystyrene foam can now be part of our environmental packaging solution.”

This LCA was designed to determine the environmental impact of Cascades' food packaging trays. Seven types of packaging materials were considered, including foamed and oriented polystyrene (XPS and OPS) or no. 6 plastic, standard and recycled polyethylene terephthalate (PET and RPET) or no. 1 plastic, polylactic acid polymer (PLA) member of the no. 7 plastic category, polypropylene (PP) or no. 5 plastic and finally molded pulp made of recycled newspapers and telephone books.

The analysis undertaken on Cascades' behalf has permitted the identification of those aspects with the greatest impact throughout the life cycle of different products. “These findings have us taking stock of our current situation so that we can better understand our impact and thereby improve our efforts to reduce the environmental footprint left by our products,” explains Mr. Langevin.