Plastic vs paper debate builds momentum as Swedish research ranks paper-based packs most eco-friendly

Plastic vs paper debate builds momentum as Swedish research ranks paper-based packs most eco-friendly

03 Jan 2019 --- Switching material from plastic to paperboard can reduce the climate impact of packaging by 99 percent in some instances, according to a recent study conducted by IVL Swedish Environmental Research Institute for Iggesund Paperboard (Iggesund). The study investigated some of the most common packaging types, including plastic packs, and found that in every comparison, paper generated the most environmentally beneficial performance.

Packaging light bulbs in plastic or paperboard, respectively, is the most extreme example in the survey. By switching from plastic to paperboard, it is possible to reduce the climate impact of the packaging by 99 percent, the study found.

In the example that was most favorable for plastic, a paperboard carton containing 500 grams of pasta was compared with the corresponding amount of pasta packed in a thin plastic bag. The conclusion was that the plastic bag has a 3.25x larger climate impact than the paperboard carton. This is despite the fact that the bag only weighs one-sixth as much as the carton and has significantly worse protective and stacking properties, according to Iggesund.

“Plastic is a fantastic material for many appClick to EnlargeIn extreme cases, switching packaging material from plastic to paperboard can reduce a packaging’s climate impact by up to 99 percent, according to Iggesund’s research.lications and we use it ourselves when producing paperboard for food packaging that needs a thin plastic barrier to protect its contents,” says Johan Granås, Sustainability Communication Manager, Iggesund. “But we believe that decision-makers in the packaging industry must know about the effects of their choice of material.”

“There are masses of packaging that cannot be made in anything other than plastic today. But there is also packaging made of plastic where it is easy to switch material without losing function at all – and it is logical to start there if we want to reduce packaging’s climate impact,” adds Granås.

For the paperboard packs used in the study, climate data for Iggesund’s paperboard Invercote was used. For the plastic materials, IVL drew on data from the databases used for lifecycle analyses. None of the paperboard packs used in the study are made of material from Iggesund Paperboard.

“This is a study that shows the climate impact of different types of packaging. The mandate to IVL was to be general. We do not know the climate data for each individual packaging. However, based on the recognized environmental databases, this definitely indicates the great importance of the choice of material,” Granås concludes.

Paper and paperboard have witnessed somewhat of a resurgence, fueled by anti-plastic sentiment and a growing global demand for designed-in recyclability. Not only is paper a naturally renewable, recyclable and compostable material, it can also add value to packaging with the appearance of “naturalness” in an increasingly eco-conscious consumer market. In terms of shelf-appeal, paper also provides an excellent printing substrate with potential for high-quality graphics to effectively communicate brand values (and sustainability credentials).

“As a natural, annually renewable resource supporting valuable eco-services such as carbon/water cycling and biodiversity, paper and paperboard offer distinct environmental sustainability credentials,” Richard Coles, sustainability expert and Director of Emagine Packaging, tells PackagingInsights.

“The raw material (wood) can be sourced from sustainably managed forests and biomass/renewable energy may be used to power modern mills. In particular, paper and paperboard are both readily recyclable and compostable and so, by definition, biodegradable,” Coles adds.

However, in stark contrast to the Iggesund study, a new US and Canadian study into the environmental effects of plastics has concluded that plastics are more sustainable than the material alternatives in terms of energy use, water consumption, solid waste, greenhouse gas emissions, ozone depletion, eutrophication and acidification.

Published last month, the study conducted by the Plastics Division of the American Chemistry Council (ACC) found that replacing plastics with alternative materials such as paper and paperboard, glass, steel, aluminum, textiles, rubber and cork would result in significant net negative environmental impacts.

Packaging suppliers are increasingly turning to paper and paperboard as an alternative to plastics. In some cases, such as UK supermarket Iceland removing all plastic packaging from its bananas in September and replacing it with a recycled paper band, paper enables a complete eradication of a material which has – rightly or wrongly – come to embody environmental scourge in the eyes of the consumer.

By Joshua Poole

To contact our editorial team please email us at editorial@cnsmedia.com

Related Articles

17 Jan 2019 --- A notable collaboration between Nestlé and Danimer Scientific may produce a marine biodegradable water bottle prototype in the next two to three years. The partnership is part of the company’s broader plan to reach its “waste-free future” vision. The plan looks beyond recycling, to include further investment in research alternatives to plastic material.
17 Jan 2019 --- Danone has collaborated with Amcor to produce a transparent, wide-mouth, spoonable jar for its all-natural yogurt, sold in Argentina. Appealing to the growing “mindful consumer” market in Latin America, the 200ml jar is made from transparent PET, meaning it is 100 percent recyclable, while consumers can easily see the all-nature yogurt through the jar.
16 Jan 2019 --- As the pressure to tackle mounting plastic waste continues, 30 companies have joined forces to launch the Alliance to End Plastic Waste (AEPW). Comprising companies from across the plastic value chain, including petrochemical companies ExxonMobil and Shell, consumer companies Dow and Procter and Gamble (P&G), as well as recycling companies Veolia and Suez, the alliance has pledged US$1.5 billion towards plastic recycling and clean-up efforts over the next five years.
16 Jan 2019 --- Spanish supermarket chain Eroski has introduced a handful of own-brand products featuring Nutri-Score labeling. This makes Eroski the first distribution company in Spain to incorporate this “advanced nutrition” labeling. The Nutri-Score system classifies foods into five levels, indicated by colored letters – from “A” in dark green to “E” in dark orange. It is calculated on the basis of the calories, the nutrients which are beneficial for our health – fiber, protein, amount of fruit, vegetables, nuts and pulses – and nutrients whose intake should be reduced – saturated fat, salt and sugar – per 100 grams of the product.
16 Jan 2019 --- UK supermarket chain Waitrose has ceased using black plastic to package hundreds of its own-label products. It plans to completely eradicate hard-to-recycle black plastics from own-label products by the end of 2019. Waitrose is also encouraging customers to bring reusable containers to the supermarket’s fresh service counters to minimize the use of plastic bags.